The Brooklyn Law School Library will be closed from Friday, December 24 and reopens Monday, January 3, 2011. The BLS Library Blog wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy Holiday, and a Happy New Year.

A keyword search of SARA, the BLS Library Catalog, for Christmas yields only a few hits, one of which is notable. Charles Dickens in Chancery: Being an Account of his Proceedings in Respect of the “Christmas Carol” with Some Gossip in Relation to the Old Law Courts at Westminster is available through the library’s Making of Modern Law subscription. It tells the story about Charles Dickens holiday classic, A Christmas Carol published a few days before Christmas of 1843 and the legal affair that unfolded in its aftermath. The book’s successful publication is a story all of its own. Its success led to a number of unauthorized variations in the month following publication. One of these appeared in book shops on January 6, 1844 with the title “A Christmas Ghost Story. Re-Originated from the Original by Charles Dickens, Esq., and Analytically Condensed Expressly for This Work”. Two days later Dickens’s solicitor filed for an injunction against its publisher, Peter Parley’s Illuminated Library to stop publication of this obviously plagiarized edition. The defendants argued that Dickens’s works had been “re-originated” before and Dickens had not filed suit to stop the practice. However, Vice-Chancellor Bruce found that this piracy had gone “beyond all previous instances” and ruled in Dickens’s favor.

Dickens initiated five more suits against plagiarists of his popular “little Carol” in the next four months. Because the defendants all declared bankruptcy, there were no assets to pay even the court costs Dickens incurred while trying to protect his intellectual property. While his own publisher sold thousands of copies of his classic tale, his profit was greatly reduced by his encounter with Chancery Court. For more on the Carol lawsuit, see Grafting A Christmas Carol by Michael Hancher, SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Volume 48, Number 4, Autumn 2008, pp. 813-827, available through the BLS Library subscription to Project Muse.

Dickens’ Pyrrhic victory in the Christmas Carol suit arguably led to his protest against the arrogance of law and judges in his novel Bleak House published a decade later. Consider this quote from from the opening pages of Bleak House:

This is the Court of Chancery; which has its decaying houses and its blighted lands in every shire; which has its worn-out lunatic in every churchyard; which has its ruined suitor, with his slipshod heels and threadbare dress, borrowing and begging through the rounds of every man’s acquaintance; which gives to monied might; the means abundantly of wearying out the right; which so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope; so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart; that there is not an honorable man among its practitioners who does not give—who does not often give—the warning, “Suffer any wrong that can be done you, rather than come here!”

The Library wants to hear your suggestions, comments and even constructive criticisms about Library services and policies.  Beginning with the spring semster in January 2011, we will read your suggestions from SARA, our online catalog, and then not only respond to the student making the suggestion, but post our response on the Library bulletin boards if the question and answer are of general interest to the student body.

Where do you post your suggestions for the Library staff to read?  In SARA, the online catalog.  From the Library home page click on “Classic Sara” and at the bottom of the next page, the search page, click on “Suggestions.”  Here you may type your suggestions and comments and then click on “Submit this Suggestion.” 

Your suggestions will be read every Friday and answers posted on the bulletin boards the following Tuesday.

Let us hear from you!

To provide a useful tool for empirical legal research scholars, the Brooklyn Law School Library has enhanced its subscription to LexisNexis Statistical Universe aka Statistical Insight. This database, avalable on the BLS Library A to Z list, will now provide access to 12 billion data points from licensed and public domain datasets. Much of the new coverage allows for searching the database so that each entry in a result list will be accompanied by a new PDF icon when applicable. LexisNexis Statistical DataSets is a module within Statistical Insight that provides Web-based research solutions for fast and easy access within an easy-to-use interface. This tool permits scanning the contents of the collection, selecting subjects of interest, and viewing data in side-by-side tables and charts. The product is completely interactive and results are instantaneous. Each time a user clicks on a new element, the elements that are shown in the display area are updated, and a new table, chart, and/or map appear. When looking up statistical information, this database may be the ideal starting point.

Other components of LN Complete Statistical Package include:

• LexisNexis Statistical Insight Tables
• American Statistics Index (ASI)
• ASI Online with PDFs from 2004 forward- Full Text Statistical Reference Index (SRI)
• SRI Online with PDFs from 2008 forward- Full Text
• Index to International Statistics (IIS)
• IIS Online with PDFs from 2007 forward-Full Text

LexisNexis has created a number of useful resources to help answer questions about the product including a libguide, a wiki and a guide book. This video is one of several that LexisNexis created to explain the product:

The Middle Class Tax Relief Act of 2010 has become the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Jobs Creation Act of 2010. Despite objections across the political spectrum, the House and Senate are likely to pass the compromise tax bill. The complexities of the compromise make assessing its wisdom difficult. To make the task a little easier, Brooklyn Law School Professor of Law Bradley Borden wrote The Prince and the Paupers: A Tax Fable to explain the current tax system to his daughter. The article addresses the fairness of the tax system ending with Brad’s daughter asking the unanswered question “Why don’t more people tell Congress to change the tax law?”

The BLS Library has a number of items in its collection dealing with the inequities of the tax code. See for example Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich–and Cheat Everybody Else by David Cay Johnston (Call # HJ2362 .J64 2003) with these chapters: Taxes: they’re not for everyone — A nickel an hour more — Rich get fabulously richer — Big payday — Plane perks — When the old man is dead and buried — Stealth tax — How social security taxes subsidize the rich — Preying on the working poor — Handcuffing the tax police — Mr. Rossotti’s customers — For want of a keystroke — Mr. Kellogg’s favorite loophole — Mass market tax evasion — Getting off the hook — Profiting off taxes — Profits trump patriotism — Letters to Switzerland — Gimme shelter — Only the rich deserve a comfortable retirement — Is reform possible?

As an experiment, Brooklyn Law School Library began to offer earplugs to students during the school’s Reading and Examination Period. Each term the Library orders enough earplugs so that each student can have one pair throughout the Reading and Examination Period.

An earplug is a device that is meant to be inserted in the ear canal to protect the wearer’s ears from loud noises or the intrusion of water, foreign bodies, dust or excessive wind. The first recorded use of wax earplugs is in the Odyssey, wherein Odysseus’s crew used wax earplugs to avoid being distracted by the Sirens’ songs. Current earplug material was invented in 1967, at National Research in the USA, by Ross Gardner and his team. As part of a project on sealing joints, they developed a resin with energy absorption properties.

Brooklyn Law School Library earplugs were such a hit during the Fall 2010 Reading and Examination Period that by the second week of exams, there were no more earplugs. This may be because our users did not recycle their earplugs. Based on student demand, the Library has rush ordered another 1200 earplugs which will be available on Thursday, December 16th.

The Brooklyn Law School Library listening to its users. Due the abuse of this practice (students not recycling their earplugs), the Library is reevaluating the free and open access earplug give away.

A New York Law Journal article (password required) reports that the Appellate Division, Second Department based in Brooklyn recently ruled that, under New York law, a wrongful death action brought on behalf of a child who was in utero at the time of his father’s death may proceed to trial over objections tnat child in utero suffered no pecuniary loss. The case is Seaton v. County of Suffolk brought on behalf of the now 8 year old boy whose father, then 20 year old student Jose Colon died in 2002 from gunshots accidentally fired by Suffolk County police during a drug raid involving several ounces of marijuana. The shooting occured three days after Colon learned that his ex-girlfriend was six-weeks pregnant with his child. Seven months later, she gave birth to the son on whose behalf the wrongful death action was filed.

The mother of the deceased Colon joined the mother of his child to sue the county and the police department. The defense moved to dismiss the claims on behalf of the decedent’s non-marital child arguing that the case “presents all of the complications associated with a pecuniary loss claim that is proffered on behalf of a fetus: the decedent did not contribute to the support or medical care of the fetus’ mother; the decedent was involved in a relationship with a different ‘girlfriend’ at the time he was allegedly told about the fetus; paternity of the fetus was not established prior to the decedent’s death; the gestational age of the fetus was alleged to be six weeks at the time of the decedents’ death.” Both the trial court and the appeals court rejected the motion relying on NY’s Estate, Powers & Trusts Law governing intestate succession. Section 4-1.2 of the EPTL (amended in 2009) states that a “non-marital child is the legitimate child of his father so that he and his issue inherit from his father and his paternal kindred if . . . paternity has been established by clear and convincing evidence . . . [and] the father openly and notoriously acknowledged the child as his own.” A posthumous DNA test showed clear and convincing proof of paternity.

The case will go to trial with a possible large damages award on behalf of the child. Plaintiffs submitted an affidavit estimating that, based on the decedent’s age, education and $11 per hour income at the time of his death, his son suffered a pecuniary loss of income of $1.35 million. The Brooklyn Law School Library has in its New York collection New York Damages Awards: Personal Injury & Intentional Torts (Call #KFN5311.N48) published annually by West. The library keeps the latest 2010 edition which has cases arranged in chapters according to the injured part of the body. The book includes checklists and forms.

The Law Librarian Blog has a recent post citing former Brooklyn Law School Adjunct Professor Steven C. Bennett’s article When Will Law School Change? 89 Neb. L. Rev. 87 (2010), discussing ways to integrate neglected fundamental professional legal skills into the law school curriculum. In the article, Bennett states “Students should also get some experience as clients themselves, perhaps in role-playing exercises, to help them recognize the needs of those they may come to serve. Training in interviewing skills, counseling and negotiating—all among the most basic and transferable skills for use in practice—can help students develop a sense of the elements of lawyering that extend beyond pure legal reasoning and analysis.”

Brooklyn Law School includes in its curriculum experiences and training he advocates. Professor Gary Schultze teaches a Negotiation Seminare where students study the theories and skills of negotiation, read and discuss writings on negotiation and work with outside participants such as practicing attorneys and psychologists. There is extensive use of videotaping and group analysis of various negotiation techniques. In the upcoming spring 2011 semester, Princeton University Professor John Darley will be visiting Brooklyn Law School to teach an Intensive Negotiation Workshop. Darley, a Professor of Public Policy at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs and a pioneer of social psychology, is known for his work on altruism, bystander intervention, deviation and conformity, attribution, moral judgment, and psychology and law.

For several years, Brooklyn Law School Associate Professor of Clinical Law Karen Van Ingen, whose expertise includes Alternative Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Arbitration, has directed the Investor Rights Clinic and taught a seminar in arbitrating investor rights. To teach mediation and negotiating skills to her students, Prof. Van Ingen has looked to the BLS Library audio visual collection for such items as Saving the Last Dance: Mediation through Understanding (Call #KF9084 .S27 2001) and Negotiation in the Practice of Law: a Video Companion (Call #KF9084.Z9 N435 1998). These are two items in the BLS Library’s AV collection. Maria Okonska, BLS Library Manager of Bibliographic Operations, states that there are 523 videos in the library’s AV collection in Room 111 on the first floor of the library.

The library has in its print collection The Lawyer’s Guide to Negotiation by X.M. Frascogna and H. Hetherington (Call #KF300 .F75 2009). Chapters in this item are: Law practice is negotiation — Power of leverage — Personal negotiating style: how leverage is used — Preparation: the essential ingredient for success — Opening moves: how to seize control of the negotiation — Maintaining control at every stage of the negotiation — Tactical negotiating ploys that can improve your bargaining position — Fallback strategy: a systematic approach to dealing with setbacks — Closing — Deal making: guidelines for successful business negotiation — Negotiating lawsuit settlements.

Monday, December 6 is the last day of fall semester classes at Brooklyn Law School. The reading period starts on Tuesday and the fall semester examination period running from December 9 to December 22. Students looking for advice on taking and passing law school exams can review this list of web sites:

A Common Law School Exam Mistake – a post from the Volokh Conspiracy blog that talks about how to organize exam answers and how not to organize them

Beyond IRAC: Law School Exam Taking Tips – the Legal Profession Blog’s advice on how to write law school exams

CALI’s Law School Exam Advice Post – links to essays and podcasts on how to do well on both essay and multiple choice law school exams

Law Career Blog’s Exam-Taking Advice – short and helpful exam-taking advice with three links

Lawyerist’s Tried and True Advice for Law School Exams – posts on taking different types of law school exams

University of Washington Law Library Law School Exam Page – a bibliography of exam prep sources

Writing Law Examinations – an essay by Yale Law School Professor John H. Langbein reposted on Westlaw



The BLS Library has Law School Success in a Nutshell: A Guide to Studying Law And Taking Law School Exams by Ann M. Burkhart, Robert A. Stein (Reserve – Call #KF283 .B87 2008) on reserve at the circulation desk. Chapter 12 has thirty pages of topics dealing specifically with law school exams.



These items are in the Main Collection in the lower level of the library:

Law School Exams: Preparing and Writing to Win by Charles R. Calleros (Main Collection – Call #KF283 .C35 2007) – Part Four (Taking Law School Exams) has about 80 pages along with three appendices with sample answers to essay exam exercises.

Getting to Maybe: How to Excel on Law School Exams by Dean Jeremy Paul and Prof. Michael Fischl (Main Collection – Call #KF283 .F47 1999).

Human Rights Watch’s latest report The Price of Freedom: Bail and Pretrial Detention of Low Income Nonfelony Defendants in New York City is a study that addresses the pretrial incarceration of New York City defendants accused of non-felony crimes, such as shoplifting, smoking marijuana or disorderly conduct in 2008. It states that in about three out of four of total 117,064 cases studied, defendants were released on their own recognizance. But for 19,137 people, bail was set at $1,000 or less and most of those defendants were unable to pay. In 87% of the cases (16,649), the defendants were not able to post bail at their arraignment and were incarcerated pending trial. The average length of pretrial detention was 15.7 days. Almost three out of four (71.1%) were accused of nonviolent, non-weapons related crimes. At any given moment, 39% of the city’s jail population consists of felony and non-felony pretrial detainees who are in jail because they have not posted bail. The report is worth reading for all its statistical information on bail such as that contained in this table.

The report suggests implentation of pretrial supervision program as an alternative to pretrial detention from both a cost and a human rights perspective. Pretrial supervision would not only honor the presumption of innocence, but would save the city tens of millions of dollars in jail costs. It also states that pretrial confinement increases the likelihood of conviction. Pretrial confinement prompts defendants to plead guilty and give up their right to trial. The Brooklyn Law School Library has in its catalog a two part report from 2008 titled Bail, Detention, & Felony Case Outcomes and Pretrial Detention and Case Outcomes, Part 2: Felony Cases by Mary T. Phillips. While it deals with felonies rather than misdemeanors, it states that “A conviction was more likely in cases with a defendant who was detained, as opposed to released, at arraignment. Citywide, 59% of cases with a released defendant ended in a conviction, compared to 74% of a detained defendant.”